Summary of recommendations
Summary of recommendations
GUIDELINE UPDATES - This guideline was last updated 01/07/2022
This guideline contains evidence-based recommendations (EBR), consensus-based recommendations (CBR) and practice points (PP) as defined in Table B.4 NHMRC approved recommendation types and definitions.
Table B.5. Key to types of recommendations in these guidelines outlines the types of recommendations appearing in these guidelines.
This is a summary of the recommendations in these guidelines, numbered according to chapter to which they relate. Please note that some chapters do not have associated recommendations.
Recommendations
4. Unsatisfactory cervical screening results
Practice point |
REC4.1: Attempt adequate repeat preparations for an unsatisfactory LBC test In the case of unsatisfactory LBC, laboratories should ensure that adequate repeat preparations are attempted, after dealing with potentially remediable technical problems. |
Practice point |
REC4.2: Report cellular abnormality for LBC specimens with abnormal cells Any LBC specimen with abnormal cells should not be reported as ‘Unsatisfactory’. The identified cellular abnormality should be reported. |
Practice point |
REC4.3: Recall women in 6 weeks if they have an unsatisfactory screening report A woman with an unsatisfactory screening report should have a repeat sample collected in 6 weeks. If the reason for the unsatisfactory sample has been identified then this problem should be corrected if possible before the repeat sample is collected. |
6. Management of HPV test results
MSAC evidence-based recommendation |
REC6.1: Eligibility for screening on a self-collected sample to include all people eligible for cervical screening Anyone who is eligible for cervical screening (people with a cervix aged 25-74 years who have ever been sexually active) should be offered the choice of HPV testing on a self-collected vaginal sample or on a clinician-collected sample. |
Practice point |
REC6.2: Clinican-collected cervical samples A short course of topical oestrogen therapy could be considered in post-menopausal women, people experiencing vaginal dryness, or trans men, prior to collecting the sample, for example daily for a period of at least 2 weeks, ceasing 1-2 days prior to the appointment. The reason for this should be explained (to reduce discomfort from the speculum and to improve the diagnostic accuracy of any associated LBC). |
Oncogenic HPV types not detected
MSAC evidence-based recommendation |
REC6.3: Oncogenic HPV types not detected at routine screening Women who have a screening HPV test in which oncogenic HPV types are not detected should rescreen in 5 years. |
Oncogenic HPV types 16 and/or 18
MSAC evidence-based recommendation |
REC6.4: Women with a positive HPV (16/18) test result Women with a positive oncogenic HPV (16/18) test result should be referred directly for colposcopic assessment, which will be informed by the result of LBC. If the sample has been collected by a healthcare practitioner, then reflex LBC will be performed by the laboratory. If the sample was self-collected, then a sample for LBC should be collected at the time of colposcopy. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC6.5: Referral of women with a positive HPV (16/18) test result and LBC prediction of invasive cancer to a gynaecological oncologist Women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (16/18) test result with a reflex LBC report of invasive cancer (squamous, glandular or other) should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist or gynaecological cancer centre for urgent evaluation, ideally within 2 weeks. |
Practice point |
REC6.6: Referral of women with a positive HPV (16/18) test result and reflex LBC pHSIL/HSIL Women with a positive oncogenic HPV (16/18) test result and reflex LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL should be referred for colposcopic assessment at the earliest opportunity, ideally within 8 weeks. |
Practice point |
REC6.7: Referral of women with a positive HPV (16/18) test result and unsatisfactory LBC When HPV 16/18 is detected, colposcopic referral is required regardless of the LBC result and the screening episode should be classified as ‘Higher risk for cervical cancer or precursors’. If reflex LBC is unsatisfactory or the screening sample has been self-collected a cervical sample, then LBC should be collected at the time of colposcopy. |
Oncogenic HPV types not 16/18
Evidence-based recommendation | Grade |
REC6.8: Positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result at routine screening
| C |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC6.9: Referral to gynaecological oncologist for LBC prediction of invasive disease Women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result with a LBC report of invasive cancer (squamous, glandular or other) should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist or gynaecological cancer centre for urgent evaluation, ideally within 2 weeks. |
Practice point |
REC6.10: Referral of women with a positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result and LBC prediction of pHSIL, HSIL or any glandular abnormality Women with a positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result, with a LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL or any glandular abnormality, should be referred for colposcopic assessment at the earliest opportunity, ideally within 8 weeks. |
Evidence-based recommendation | Grade |
REC6.11: Management after follow-up HPV test at 12 months, following initial positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) screening test result At follow-up HPV testing 12 months after a detection of HPV (not 16/18) and LBC results of negative or pLSIL/LSIL:
Management of those with HPV (not 16/18) detected at 12 months is described in REC6.12 - 6.14 | C |
Practice point |
REC6.12: Management after follow-up HPV test at 12 months, following initial positive detection of HPV (not 16/18), for women who:
If oncogenic HPV (any type) is detected at the follow-up HPV test, then the woman should be referred for colposcopic assessment. If the follow-up sample was collected by a healthcare professional then the laboratory will undertake reflex LBC. If the follow-up sample was self-collected then a sample for LBC should be collected at the time of colposcopy. Management of those with HPV (not 16/18) detected at 12 months who do not fall into any of the above categories is described in REC6.13-6.14 Approval: 1-Feb-2021 |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC6.13: Management after follow-up HPV test at 12 months, following initial positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) screening test result: HPV (not 16/18) detected at 12 months If HPV (not 16/18) is detected again, and the woman does not fall into any of the categories in REC6.12, then LBC should be performed. If the follow-up sample was collected by a healthcare professional then the laboratory will undertake reflex LBC. If the follow-up sample was self-collected then the woman should be advised to return to her healthcare professional so that a sample can be collected for LBC.
Management of those with HPV (not 16/18) detected at 12 months with negative/ pLSIL/ LSIL LBC is described in REC6.14 Approval: 1-Feb-2021 |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC6.14: Management after follow-up HPV test at 12 months, following an initial positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) screening test result Approval: 1-Feb-2021 |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC6.15: Management after second follow-up HPV test, following initial detection of HPV (not 16/18) at the baseline screening test
Approval: 1-Feb-2021 |
Self-collected vaginal samples
Practice Point |
REC6.16: Informed choice for patients about self-collection Among those attending for a routine screening test, approximately 2% have HPV16/18 detected and approximately 6% have HPV (not 16/18) detected, although the latter varies by age. |
Practice Point |
REC6.17: Settings where self-collection can be performed However, with the aim to maximise participation in cervical screening, collection of the sample can occur in any setting that the healthcare professional* ordering the test believes is appropriate, including in the context of a telehealth consultation. The healthcare professional should facilitate access to screening, and the pathology laboratory should deliver the results to the requesting healthcare professional who will be responsible for informing patients of their results and any required follow-up. Within these constraints, healthcare professionals and laboratories have flexibility to develop models of screening that best meet the needs of their communities. * Only doctors and nurse practitioners can sign the pathology request for tests under current MBS rules. |
Practice Point |
REC6.18 Assistance with sample self-collection Women who have difficulty collecting a lower vaginal sample by themselves could be assisted to do so by the provider. Alternatively the provider could collect the sample using a self-collection swab without using a speculum. A sample collected in this way is still classified as self-collection on the pathology request form. |
Practice Point |
REC6.19 Support for underscreened women Women in whom HPV (any type) is detected in a self-collected sample and who were overdue for screening may require additional and individualised support to progress along the clinical pathway, and access to follow-up services where they will receive sensitive treatment. This additional support may involve, for example, reassurance and explanation of the screening pathway and follow-up procedures, longer appointments, or additional follow-up contact. |
Practice point |
REC6.20 Indication for genital inspection Routine genital inspection is not indicated in all people attending for cervical screening, but could still be offered to people who undergo screening on a self-collected sample with any clinical indication that genital inspection is appropriate or who are from populations who are at high risk for vulvar disease. |
Practice point |
REC6.21 Follow-up HPV test after initial self-collected screening sample Approval: 1-Feb-2021 Note: recommendation numbering changed Feb 2021, this was previously 6.14 |
Women undergoing exit testing
MSAC evidence-based recommendation |
REC6:22 Women aged 70–74 years in whom oncogenic HPV is not detected (exit testing) Women can be discharged from the NCSP if they are aged 70–74 years and have a screening test at which oncogenic HPV is not detected. Note: recommendation numbering changed Feb 2021, this was previously REC 6.16 |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC6.23: Referral of women aged 70–74 years with a positive oncogenic HPV test result (exit testing) Note: recommendation numbering changed Feb 2021, this was previously REC 6.17 |
Screening in women older than 75
NCSP recommendation |
REC6.24 Women aged 75 years or older who request screening Women who are 75 years or older who have never had a cervical screening test, or have not had one in the previous five years, may request a test and can be screened. The sample can be clinician-collected or self-collected, according to the woman’s choice. |
7. Colposcopy
Colposcopy terminology
Practice point |
REC7.1: New colposcopy terminology The new terminology adopted by the IFCPC in 2011 should be incorporated into Australian practice. |
History, examination and investigation
Practice point |
REC7.2: Preparation for colposcopy: post menopausal women, people experiencing vaginal dryness, or trans men A short course of topical oestrogen therapy could be considered in post-menopausal women, people experiencing vaginal dryness, or trans men, for example daily for a period of at least 2 weeks, ceasing 1-2 days prior to the appointment. The reason for this should be explained (to reduce discomfort from the speculum and to improve the diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy and any associated LBC and/or biopsy). |
Practice point |
REC7.3: Colposcopy and acetic acid Acetic acid should be applied for 2 minutes to allow sufficient time for aceto-white changes to become apparent. This is especially important when the lesion is low grade as it may take more time to become visible. |
Practice point |
REC7.4: Colposcopy and VAIN When the LBC report predicts a squamous abnormality and there is no colposcopically visible cervical lesion, careful colposcopic examination of the vagina should be performed to exclude VAIN, using acetic acid and Lugol’s Iodine. |
Practice point |
REC7.5: Repeat LBC usually not necessary at time of colposcopy
|
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC7.6: Biopsy of high grade lesions The cervix should be biopsied when the LBC prediction is pHSIL or HSIL and the colposcopic appearance shows major change (see IFCPC definition above) and the abnormal TZ is visible (Type 1 or Type 2 TZ). |
Practice point |
REC7.7: Biopsy visible lesion if suspicious for invasion when T3 TZ colposcopy In some situations, when there is a visible high-grade lesion on the ectocervix but there is a T3 TZ (lesion extends into canal out of visual range), it may be reasonable to take a cervical biopsy of the visible lesion if there is any suspicion of superficially invasive or invasive carcinoma. |
Practice point |
REC7.8: Biopsy of low-grade lesions is encouraged but not always necessary Women with a LBC prediction of pLSIL or LSIL and a colposcopic impression of low-grade disease or less may not always require a biopsy. However, biopsy is accepted practice for confirmation of the colposcopic impression and exclusion of high-grade disease, and should be encouraged, especially for less experienced colposcopists. |
Practice point |
REC7.9: Upper genital tract imaging Upper genital tract imaging (usually transvaginal ultrasound) should be considered in cases where no lower genital tract abnormality is detected at colposcopy after referral with abnormal glandular cytology (including atypical glandular cells or endocervical cells of undetermined significance). In some women, further investigation, such as endometrial sampling to exclude an endometrial origin for atypical glandular cells, may be required. |
Treatment
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC7.10: Colposcopy prior to treatment †adequate: the cervix is clearly seen (IFCPC 2011 terminology) |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC7.11: Histopathological confirmation prior to treatment Treatment should be reserved for women with histologically confirmed HSIL (CIN2/3) or AIS, except for women requiring diagnostic excisional biopsy. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC7.12: Biopsy prior to ablative treatment Women should have a cervical biopsy prior to any ablative treatment. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC7.13: Pathology review of discordant test results For women who have had a colposcopy with significant discordance between the histopathology and the referral cytology, both specimens should be reviewed by a pathologist from at least one of the reporting laboratories who should then convey the results of the review to the colposcopist in order to inform the management plan. |
Practice point |
REC7.14: Tertiary referral may be necessary
|
Practice point |
REC7.15: Second opinion When there is any concern about diagnosis or patient management, a second opinion should be sought and documented. |
Practice point |
REC7.16: The role of multidisciplinary team review
|
Practice point |
REC7.17: Colposcopy at time of treatment All treatments should be performed under colposcopic vision, with the exception of cold-knife cone biopsy. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC7.18: Criteria for ablative treatment
|
Practice point |
REC7.19: Depth of ablation A Type 1 TZ with a HSIL (CIN2/3) lesion requires 6–8 mm (and not more than 10 mm) of cervical ablation to be adequately treated. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC7.20: Excision specimen quality and pathology Excisional therapy should aim to remove the entire TZ with a pre-determined length of cervical tissue, ideally in one piece, with minimal distortion or artefact to the final histological specimen.† †This is critical for management of suspected or histologically confirmed AIS. |
Practice point |
REC7.21: Excision specimen quality, pathology and very large ectocervical lesion A very large ectocervical lesion may require removal in two pieces in order to remove the entire lesion. It is still important that the endocervical and stromal margins are suitable for pathological interpretation and that the specimens are accurately oriented and labelled. |
Practice point |
REC7.22: Excisional techniques and surgical competency Therapeutic colposcopists should use the excisional techniques with which they are comfortable and competent and that produce the best histological specimen. |
Practice point |
REC7.23: Cold-knife cone biopsy: setting Cold-knife cone biopsy should be performed in an operating theatre, under general anaesthesia, by a gynaecological oncologist or gynaecologist competent in the technique. |
Practice point |
REC7.24: Loop excisional biopsy technique (LEEP/LLETZ) A single pass of the loop (side to side or posterior to anterior) to produce a specimen in one piece is optimal. |
Practice point |
REC7.25: Loop ‘top-hat’ excisions should be avoided (LEEP/LLETZ) The ‘top-hat’ excision techniques using a wire loop, in which a second piece of endocervical tissue is removed after the first excision, is not an alternative to a properly performed single-piece Type 3 excision, and should be avoided. |
Practice point |
REC7.26: Cold-knife cone biopsy and AIS Predicted or histologically confirmed AIS should be treated by a Type 3 excision (usually a cold-knife cone biopsy) performed in an operating theatre, under general anaesthesia, by a gynaecological oncologist or gynaecologist competent in the technique. |
Practice point |
REC7.27: Role of repeat excision in management of SISCCA In the presence of a superficially invasive squamous carcinoma, if HSIL (CIN2/3) extends to any excision margin, a repeat excision (usually by cold-knife cone biopsy) is recommended. |
Practice point |
REC7.28: Do not treat at first visit with a LBC report of a low-grade lesion Women who have a LBC prediction of pLSIL/LSIL should not be treated at the first visit. |
Practice point |
REC7.29: Excision required for recurrent disease after ablation If there is recurrence of high-grade disease after previous ablation, treatment should be by excision. |
Practice point |
REC7.30: Repeat excision not necessarily required for incomplete excision of high-grade lesions
|
8. Management of discordant colposcopic impression, histopathology and referral LBC prediction
Normal colposcopic findings following LBC prediction of negative, LSIL or HSIL
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.1: Normal colposcopy following LBC prediction of negative or pLSIL/LSIL
|
Practice point |
REC8.2: Normal colposcopy following LBC prediction of HSIL: cytopathology review Cytopathology review is recommended to confirm HSIL before proceeding to excisional treatment for women with a normal colposcopy after a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result and an initial LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL. |
Practice point |
REC8.3: Normal colposcopy following LBC prediction of HSIL: exclude VAIN When colposcopic impression is discordant with a referral LBC prediction of HSIL, colposcopic examination of the vagina is indicated to exclude a vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia before diagnostic excisional treatment. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.4: Normal colposcopy following LBC prediction of HSIL: diagnostic excision of TZ For women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result, normal colposcopy, and a LBC prediction of HSIL on cytopathology review, diagnostic excision of the TZ should be performed. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.5: Normal colposcopy following LBC prediction of pHSIL: consider diagnostic excision of TZ For women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result, normal colposcopy, and a LBC prediction of pHSIL on cytopathology review, diagnostic excision of the TZ should be considered, though observation is an option. |
Practice point |
REC8.6: Normal colposcopy following LBC prediction of pHSIL: diagnostic excision or observation Women who opt to defer treatment, particularly younger women with concerns about fertility, can be offered observation:
|
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.7: Downgrading of discordant results For women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result, normal colposcopy, and a subsequent LBC report of pLSIL/LSIL or less on cytopathology review, management should be according to the reviewed cytological report (i.e. repeat HPV test in 12 months). |
Practice point |
REC8.8: Colposcopist should manage discordant results Women with discordant colposcopy and LBC results should have their management supervised by the colposcopist until both the colposcopist and the woman are satisfied with the proposed management plan. |
Type 3 TZ (previously termed ‘unsatisfactory’) colposcopy following LBC prediction of negative, LSIL or HSIL
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.9: Repeat HPV test after Type 3 TZ colposcopy and referral LBC negative or pLSIL/LSIL
|
Practice point |
REC8.10: Cytopathology review prior to observation for pLSIL/LSIL and Type 3 TZ at colposcopy
|
Practice point |
REC8.11: Role of ECC in Type 3 TZ colposcopy following LBC prediction of pLSIL/LSIL Despite a lack of evidence, endocervical curettage can be considered for women who have a positive oncogenic HPV test result (any type) with a LBC report of persistent pLSIL/LSIL and colposcopy reported as Type 3 TZ.† A negative ECC may provide additional reassurance for a conservative (observational) approach. †Type 3 TZ indicates failure to visualise the upper limit of the TZ, or the entire TZ is within the endocervical canal. It corresponds to ‘unsatisfactory’ in previous terminology. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.12: Diagnostic excision of the TZ should not be performed if there is no cytological or histological evidence of a high-grade lesion after Type 3 TZ colposcopy For asymptomatic women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result, Type 3 TZ† colposcopy, and no cytological, colposcopic or histological evidence of a high-grade lesion, further diagnostic procedures (such as diagnostic excision of the transformation zone) should not routinely be performed. †Type 3 TZ indicates failure to visualise the upper limit of the TZ, or the entire TZ is within the endocervical canal. It corresponds to ‘unsatisfactory’ in previous terminology. |
Practice point |
REC8.13: Role of diagnostic excision: exceptions to recommendation against diagnostic excision of TZ in the absence of high-grade cytology or histology
†Type 3 TZ indicates failure to visualise the upper limit of the TZ, or the entire TZ is within the endocervical canal. It corresponds to ‘unsatisfactory’ in previous terminology. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC8.14: Diagnostic excision: Type 3 TZ colposcopy after LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL Cytopathology review should be considered to confirm a high-grade cytological abnormality before excision, after a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result and an initial LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL, when there is a Type 3 TZ colposcopy. This is particularly important when the LBC prediction is pHSIL because pHSIL has a lower PPV for high-grade disease and the subsequent excision specimens show no evidence of cervical pathology in 45–55% of cases. |
Practice point |
REC8.15: Cytopathology review: Type 3 TZ colposcopy following LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL Cytopathology review should be considered to confirm a high-grade cytological abnormality before excision, after a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result and an initial LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL, when there is a Type 3 TZ colposcopy. This is particularly important when the LBC prediction is pHSIL because pHSIL has a lower PPV for high-grade disease and the subsequent excision specimens show no evidence of cervical pathology in 45–55% of cases. |
Practice point |
REC8.16: Deferral of treatment following cytopathology review: Repeat HPV test and colposcopy in 6 months
|
9. Management of histologically confirmed low-grade squamous abnormalities
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC9.1: HPV test 12 months after histologically confirmed LSIL (≤ CIN1)
|
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC9.2: LSIL (≤ CIN1) should not be treated Women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result with a LBC report of negative or pLSIL/LSIL, who have undergone colposcopy and have a histologically confirmed LSIL (≤ CIN1), should not be treated, because these lesions are considered to be an expression of a productive HPV infection. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC9.3: Diagnostic excision when HSIL confirmed on cytopathology review Women who have a positive oncogenic HPV test result (any type) with a LBC report of HSIL (confirmed after cytopathology review), and who have undergone colposcopy and have a histologically confirmed LSIL (≤ CIN1), should be offered diagnostic excision of the TZ. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC9.4: Option for observation following cytological prediction of pHSIL
|
Practice point |
REC9.5: Criteria for observation following cytological prediction of pHSIL
|
Practice point |
REC9.6: Cytology review essential when test results are discordant For women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result with a histologically confirmed LSIL (≤ CIN1) after LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL, both the cytology and the histopathology should be reviewed by a pathologist from at least one of the reporting laboratories, who should then convey the results of the review to the colposcopist in order to inform the management plan. |
10. Management of histologically confirmed high-grade squamous abnormalities
Diagnosis of HSIL
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC10.1: Histological diagnosis prior to treatment For women who have a visible lesion at colposcopy, histological confirmation of HSIL is recommended before undertaking definitive treatment. |
Treatment of HSIL
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC10.2: Treatment for HSIL (CIN2) Women with a histological diagnosis of HSIL (CIN2) should be treated in order to reduce the risk of developing invasive cervical carcinoma. |
Practice point |
REC10.3: p16 should be used to clarify diagnosis of HSIL (CIN2) The use of p16 immunohistochemistry is recommended to stratify the management of HSIL (CIN2) into immediate treatment or a period of observation. |
Practice point |
REC10.4: HSIL (CIN2) and observation
|
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC10.5: Treatment of HSIL (CIN3) Women with a histological diagnosis of HSIL (CIN3) should be treated in order to reduce the risk of developing invasive cervical carcinoma. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC10.6: Referral of women with invasive disease A woman with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of invasive or superficially invasive (squamous cell carcinoma) should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist or a gynaecological cancer centre for multidisciplinary team review. |
Test of Cure after treatment for HSIL (CIN2/3)
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC10.7: Test of Cure after treatment for HSIL (CIN2/3) A woman who has been treated for HSIL (CIN2/3) should have a co-test† performed at 12 months after treatment, and annually thereafter, until she receives a negative co-test on two consecutive occasions, when she can return to routine 5 yearly screening. †Co-testing can be performed by the woman’s usual healthcare professional. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC10.8: Abnormal Test of Cure results: positive oncogenic HPV (16/18) test result If, at any time post treatment, the woman has a positive oncogenic HPV (16/18) test result, she should be referred for colposcopic assessment (regardless of the reflex LBC result). |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC10.9: Abnormal Test of Cure results: LBC pHSIL/HSIL or glandular abnormality If, at any time during Test of Cure, the woman has a LBC prediction of pHSIL/HSIL or any glandular abnormality, irrespective of HPV status, she should be referred for colposcopic assessment. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC10.10: Abnormal Test of Cure results: positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result If, at any time post-treatment, the woman has a positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result and a LBC report of negative or prediction of pLSIL/LSIL, she should continue to have annual co-testing until the she has a negative co-test on two consecutive occasions, when she can return to routine 5-yearly screening. |
Practice point |
REC10.11: Fluctuating Test of Cure results: positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result and/or pLSIL/LSIL Some women may experience fluctuating results with a positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result and/or LBC prediction of pLSIL/LSIL. These women do not need colposcopic review but, if the woman is anxious, a colposcopic assessment may be appropriate to provide reassurance. |
Practice point |
REC10.12: Colposcopy is not necessary at the initial post-treatment visit The post-treatment review should:
Subsequent post-treatment Test of Cure surveillance should be performed by the woman’s GP or health professional, who should follow the recommendations for the management of any abnormal test results. |
11. Management of glandular abnormalities
Investigation of cytological glandular abnormalities
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.1: Colposcopy referral for atypical glandular/endocervical cells Women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result with a LBC report of atypical glandular/endocervical cells of undetermined significance should be referred to a gynaecologist with expertise in the colposcopic evaluation of suspected malignancies or a gynaecological oncologist. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.2: Follow-up after normal colposcopy and LBC prediction of atypical glandular/endocervical cells
|
Practice point |
REC11.3: Exclusion of upper genital tract disease before diagnostic excision
|
Practice point |
REC11.4: Role of immediate diagnostic excision of TZ versus observation
|
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC11.5: Colposcopy for possible high-grade glandular lesions Diagnostic excision of the endocervical TZ should be performed in most cases. |
Practice point |
REC11.6: Women who decline treatment for possible high-grade glandular lesions
|
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.7: Colposcopy referral for AIS Diagnostic excision of the endocervical TZ should be performed. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.8: Referral to gynaecological oncologist for LBC prediction of invasive disease Women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result with a LBC prediction of invasive adenocarcinoma should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist or a gynaecological oncology centre for urgent evaluation, ideally within 2 weeks. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.9: Specimen for histological assessment of glandular abnormalities When diagnostic excision of the TZ is performed in the investigation of glandular abnormalities, the method chosen should ensure that a single, intact specimen with interpretable margins is obtained for histological assessment. |
Practice point |
REC11.10: Cold-knife cone biopsy is the ‘gold standard’ for glandular abnormalities’ Cold-knife cone biopsy should be considered the ‘gold standard’ for the diagnostic assessment of glandular lesions. However, a diathermy excisional procedure may be appropriate in some circumstances and could provide an appropriate surgical specimen when performed by a gynaecologist with appropriate training, experience and expertise. |
Practice point |
REC11.11: Size of cone biopsy The depth and extent of the cone biopsy should be tailored to the woman's age and fertility requirements. A Type 3 Excision of the TZ is usually required. |
Practice point |
REC11.12: Cone biopsy excision margins and multifocal AIS Multifocal disease has been reported in 13–17% of cases of AIS, though the majority of lesions are unifocal. If the margin is close but apparently excised (less than 5 mm), close surveillance by Test of Cure, as recommended in these guidelines, is considered appropriate. In this situation further excision is not considered necessary. |
Follow-up after excisional treatment for AIS
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.13: Follow-up of completely excised AIS If any abnormal result is obtained on follow-up co-testing, the woman should be referred for colposcopic assessment. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC11.14: Repeat excision for incompletely excised AIS If AIS is incompletely excised (positive endocervical margin and/or deep stromal margin, not ectocervical margin) or if the margins cannot be assessed, further excision to obtain clear margins should be performed. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC11.15: Role of hysterectomy in AIS In women who have been treated for AIS by excision, with clear margins, there is no evidence to support completion hysterectomy. In this situation, hysterectomy is not recommended. |
12. Screening in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC12.1: Cervical Screening for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women should be invited and encouraged to participate in the NCSP and have a 5-yearly HPV test, as recommended for all Australian women. |
Practice point |
REC12.2: Invitations to screen for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women Specific efforts should be made to maximise delivery of culturally appropriate invitations to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. |
Practice point |
REC12.3: Cervical screening services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women Specific efforts should be made to provide accessible and culturally safe screening, diagnostic and treatment services to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. |
Practice point |
REC12.4: Eligibility for screening on self-collected sample: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people All eligible people, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, should be offered the choice of HPV testing on a self-collected vaginal sample or on a clinician-collected sample. |
Practice point |
REC12.5: Data collection and recording Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Healthcare professionals should ask all women whether they identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, and a woman’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status should be recorded on relevant clinical records, including pathology request forms, in accordance with the Australian Bureau of Statistics classification and standards. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status influences clinical management of tests in some cases. |
13. Screening after total hysterectomy
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC13.1: Total hysterectomy for benign disease Women with a normal cervical screening history, who have undergone hysterectomy for benign disease (e.g. menorrhagia, uterine fibroids or utero-vaginal prolapse), and have no cervical pathology at the time of hysterectomy, do not require further screening or follow up. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC13.2: Total hysterectomy after completed Test of Cure If unexpected LSIL or HSIL is identified in the cervix at the time of hysterectomy, then these women require follow-up with an annual co-test on a specimen from the vaginal vault until they have a negative co-test on two consecutive occasions. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC13.3: Total hysterectomy after adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) Women who have a total hysterectomy, as completion therapy or following incomplete excision of AIS at cold-knife cone biopsy or diathermy excision, should have a co-test on a specimen from the vaginal vault at 12 months and annually thereafter, indefinitely. † Until sufficient data become available to support cessation of testing |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC13.4: Total hysterectomy for treatment of high-grade CIN in the presence of benign gynaecological disease After two annual consecutive negative co-tests, the woman can be advised that no further testing is required. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC13.5: Total hysterectomy after histologically confirmed HSIL without Test of Cure After two annual consecutive negative co-tests, the woman can be advised that no further testing is required. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC13.6: Total hysterectomy and no screening history Note: Amendments to relevant Medicare Benefits Schedule items to support testing on a self-collected sample for this specific use will be effective from 1 November 2022. |
Practice point |
REC13.7: Colposcopy referral for any positive co-test result following total hysterectomy Women who have had a total hysterectomy and are under surveillance with co-testing, and have a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result and/or any cytological abnormality, should be referred for colposcopic assessment. |
Practice point |
REC13.8: Vaginal bleeding following total hysterectomy †Vaginal bleeding is quite common in the early weeks following hysterectomy and, where appropriate, should be investigated by the treating gynaecologist. |
Practice point |
REC13.9: Total hysterectomy after genital tract cancer Women who have been treated for cervical or endometrial cancer are at risk of recurrent cancer in the vaginal vault. These women should be under ongoing surveillance from a gynaecological oncologist. Therefore, they will be guided by their specialist regarding appropriate surveillance and this is outside the scope of these guidelines. |
Practice point |
REC13.10: Subtotal hysterectomy Women who have undergone subtotal hysterectomy (the cervix is not removed) should be invited to have 5-yearly HPV testing in accordance with the recommendation for the general population. Any detected abnormality should be managed according to these guidelines. |
14. Screening in pregnancy
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC14.1: Positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result with LBC negative or pLSIL/LSIL in pregnancy Pregnant women who have a positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result with a LBC report of negative or prediction of pLSIL/LSIL should have a repeat HPV test in 12 months. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC14.2: Positive oncogenic HPV (not 16/18) test result with LBC pHSIL/HSIL or any glandular abnormality in pregnancy † When practical and not deferred until the postpartum period. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC14.3: Positive HPV (16/18) test result in pregnancy † When practical and not deferred until the postpartum period. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC14.4: Referral of pregnant women with invasive disease
|
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC14.5: Colposcopy during pregnancy The aim of colposcopy in pregnant women is to exclude the presence of invasive cancer and to reassure them that their pregnancy will not be affected by the presence of an abnormal cervical screening test result. |
Practice point |
REC14.6: Colposcopy during pregnancy Colposcopy during pregnancy should be undertaken by a colposcopist experienced in assessing women during pregnancy. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC14.7: Cervical biopsy in pregnancy is usually unnecessary Biopsy of the cervix is usually unnecessary in pregnancy, unless invasive disease is suspected on colposcopy or reflex LBC predicts invasive disease. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC14.8: Defer treatment until after pregnancy Definitive treatment of a suspected high-grade lesion, except invasive cancer, may be safely deferred until after the pregnancy. |
Practice point |
REC14.9: Follow-up assessment after pregnancy The cervical sample (for HPV test and reflex LBC if necessary) could be collected at the time of postpartum check or at the time of the colposcopic assessment. |
Practice point |
REC14.10: Vaginal oestrogen prior to postpartum colposcopy †Daily for two weeks and cease approximately 3 days before colposcopy. |
Practice point |
REC14.11: Cervical screening in pregnancy Routine antenatal and postpartum care should include a review of the woman’s cervical screening history. Women who are due or overdue for screening should be screened. |
Practice point |
REC14.12: Cervical screening in pregnancy A woman can be safely screened at any time during pregnancy, provided that the correct sampling equipment is used. An endocervical brush should not be inserted into the cervical canal because of the risk of associated bleeding, which may distress women. |
Practice point |
REC14.13: Self-collection in pregnancy All women who are due for cervical screening during pregnancy may be offered the option of self-collection of a vaginal swab for HPV testing, after counselling by a health care professional about the small risk of bleeding. Women testing positive for HPV (not 16/18) on a self-collected sample should be advised to return so that a cervical sample for LBC can be collected by the healthcare provider. |
15. Screening in women who have experienced early sexual activity or have been victims of sexual abuse
MSAC evidence-based recommendation |
REC15.1: Routine cervical screening is not recommended in young women Routine cervical screening is not recommended in women under the age of 25 years. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC15.2: Early sexual activity and cervical screening in young women Note: Amendments to relevant Medicare Benefits Schedule items to support testing on a self-collected sample for this specific use will be effective from 1 November 2022. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC15.3: Women with postcoital or intermenstrual bleeding † Co-testing (HPV and LBC) is recommended as the presence of blood has the potential to adversely affect the sensitivity of the HPV and/or LBC tests. |
16. Screening in immune-deficient women
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC16.1: Immune-deficient women in whom oncogenic HPV is not detected Immune-deficient women who have a HPV test in which oncogenic HPV types are not detected should be screened every 3 years with a HPV test. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC16.2: Colposcopy referral: positive oncogenic HPV test result (any type) in immune-deficient women Women who are immune-deficient and have HPV (any type) detected should be referred for colposcopic assessment. If the screening sample was collected by a healthcare provider, then reflex LBC will be performed by the laboratory. If the screening sample was self-collected, then LBC should be undertaken at colposcopy. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC16.3: Colposcopy assessment and treatment in immune-deficient women Assessment and treatment of immune-deficient women with screen-detected abnormalities should be by an experienced colposcopist or in a tertiary centre. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC16.4: Colposcopy of whole lower genital tract in immune-deficient women The entire lower anogenital tract should be assessed, as the same risk factors apply for cervical, vaginal, vulval, perianal and anal lesions. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC16.5: Treatment in immune-deficient women When treatment of the cervix is considered necessary in immune-deficient women, it should be by excisional methods |
Practice point |
REC16.6: Histological abnormalities of the cervix in immune-deficient women Women with histologically confirmed abnormalities should be managed according to the same guidelines as women who are not immune-deficient. |
Practice point |
REC16.7: Test of Cure for treated immune-deficient women Women who are immune-deficient and treated for HSIL (CIN2/3) should have follow-up with Test of Cure as recommended in these guidelines. Women who complete Test of Cure should return to routine 3-yearly screening with a HPV test. |
Practice point |
REC16.8: Screening before solid organ transplantation Women aged between 25 and 74 years should have a review of cervical screening history when they are added to the organ transplant waiting list and while they remain on the waiting list, to confirm they are up to date with recommended screening for the general population. Women who are overdue for screening, or become due while on the waiting list ,should be screened with a HPV test so that any abnormalities can be investigated or treated as necessary prior to transplantation and commencement of immunosuppressive therapy. |
Practice point |
REC16.9: Screening women with a new diagnosis of HIV Women aged between 25 and 74 years who have a new diagnosis of HIV should have a review of their cervical screening history to ensure they are up to date with screening in line with the recommended 3-yearly interval for this group. |
Practice point |
REC16.10: Other groups that may require special consideration
|
Practice point |
REC16.11: Regular screening for immune-deficient women Women who are immune deficient should be educated regarding the increased risk from HPV infection and encouraged to attend for regular screening every 3 years. |
Practice point |
REC16.12: Young women with long term immune deficiency Note: Amendments to relevant Medicare Benefits Schedule items to support testing on a self-collected sample for this specific use will be effective from 1 November 2022. |
Practice point |
REC16.13: Guidance for immune-deficient women and their healthcare professionals It is important that immune-deficient women and their healthcare professionals are guided by a clinical immunology specialist when using these guidelines. |
17. Screening in DES-exposed women
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC17.1: Screening in DES-exposed women Women exposed to DES in utero should be offered an annual co-test and colposcopic examination of both the cervix and vagina indefinitely. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC17.2: Colposcopy referral for abnormalities in DES-exposed women Women exposed to DES in utero who have a screen-detected abnormality should be managed by an experienced colposcopist. |
Practice point |
REC17.3: Daughters of women exposed to DES However, if these women have concerns, testing similar to that recommended for their DESexposed mothers could be considered on an individual basis. Self-collection for HPV testing is not recommended. |
18. Signs and symptoms of cervical cancer
Investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.1: Postcoital and intermenstrual bleeding and testing for HPV and LBC †The woman’s recent cervical screening history should be considered. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.2: Postcoital bleeding in pre-menopausal women Pre-menopausal women who have a single episode of postcoital bleeding and a clinically normal cervix do not need to be referred for colposcopy if oncogenic HPV is not detected and LBC is negative. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.3: Persistent or recurrent post coital bleeding in pre-menopausal women Pre-menopausal women with recurrent or persistent postcoital bleeding, even in the presence of a negative co-test, should be referred to a gynaecologist for appropriate assessment, including colposcopy, to exclude genital tract malignancy. |
Practice point |
REC18.4: Postcoital bleeding and sexually transmitted infections Sexually transmitted infections, including chlamydia infection, should be considered in all women presenting with postcoital bleeding. It is necessary to obtain a sexual health history and perform appropriate tests and investigations. |
Consensus-based recommendation* |
REC18.5: Symptomatic women with LBC prediction of cervical cancer Women with symptoms and a LBC prediction of invasive cervical cancer should be referred to a gynaecological oncologist or gynaecological cancer centre for assessment, ideally within 2 weeks. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.6: Women with intermenstrual bleeding Women with persistent unexplained intermenstrual bleeding require appropriate investigation and should be referred for gynaecological assessment which may or may not include colposcopy. Common benign causes including a sexually transmitted infection or hormonal contraception-related bleeding should be excluded. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.7: Postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding require specialist referral Postmenopausal women with any vaginal bleeding, including postcoital bleeding, should be referred for a specialist gynaecological assessment (which may or may not include colposcopy) regardless of test results, to exclude genital tract malignancy. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.8 Circumstances that do not require co-testing or referral for colposcopy
|
Investigations of other symptoms - vaginal discharge and deep dyspareunia
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.9: Women with abnormal vaginal discharge and/or deep dyspareunia Almost all women with vaginal discharge and/or deep dyspareunia have benign gynaecological disease. They should be investigated appropriately, and if due for cervical screening a routine CST should be performed (rather than a co-test). |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.10: Women with unexplained persistent unusual vaginal discharge In women of any age, unexplained persistent unusual vaginal discharge, especially if malodourous or blood stained, should be investigated with a co-test (HPV and LBC) and the woman should be referred for gynaecological assessment. |
Consensus-based recommendation |
REC18.11: Women with unexplained persistent deep dyspareunia Women with unexplained persistent deep dyspareunia in the absence of bleeding or vaginal discharge should have a CST if due and referral for gynaecological assessment should be considered. |
20. Transitioning to the renewed National Cervical Screening Program
Practice point |
REC20.1: HPV test replaces the Pap test All Pap tests are replaced by HPV testing. Conventional Pap tests are no longer used. Reflex LBC will be performed on any clinician-collected sample with a positive oncogenic HPV (any type) test result. Co-testing (HPV and LBC) should be performed only as recommended in these guidelines, in the follow-up of screen-detected abnormalities or the investigation of abnormal vaginal bleeding. |
Practice point |
REC20.2: HPV testing for women in follow-up after pLSIL/LSIL
|
Practice point |
REC20.3: Colposcopic management of a prior screen-detected abnormality should continue Women who have been referred for colposcopic assessment following any cytological abnormality in the pre-renewal NCSP should continue their colposcopic management according to these guidelines. |
Practice point |
REC20.4: Prior treatment and Test of Cure Women should have an annual co-test (HPV and LBC) performed at 12 months after treatment, and annually thereafter, until both tests are negative on two consecutive occasions, when they can return to routine 5-yearly screening. A co-test cannot be performed on a self-collected sample. |
Practice point |
REC20.5: Prior treatment for AIS †Until sufficient data become available that may support a policy decision that cessation of testing is appropriate. |
Author(s):
WEBSITE UPDATES - This website was last updated 01/07/2022